Families' Anguish Over Shoreline Erosion Endangering Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.
A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards
The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.
A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Past
One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.
“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy
Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.
“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”
She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Searching for Answers and Clarity
The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.
Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.
“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”
It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”
The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.